Kino is the AI Body Composition platform that gives your gym the leg up.
Level up your gym with the accurate body composition.
Jackson represents the athletic build that body fat machines often misinterpret. Jackson's InBody scan was wrong by 9%...
Toby represents the weight-lifter build that makes up most gyms. InBody scans typically have an error with this demographic of 4%.
Laura represents the cardio-girl build that checks body fat often. InBody scans typically have an error with this demographic of 5%.
After I make my prediction, I'll tell you how confident I am.
Your body fat is in the athletic range. This indicates excellent conditioning and visible muscle definition typical of dedicated training.
Athletes in this range typically maintain their physique through consistent resistance training and balanced nutrition.
For optimal health, focus on maintaining lean muscle mass while ensuring adequate recovery between training sessions.
DEXA is considered the gold standard for body composition.
Kino recorded the lowest error for Jackson, at 0.6%.
In a random trial of 30 participants, Kino recorded an average error of 3.1% - lower than any other tested machine. Not only was Kino's the most accurate, but it's also the most cost-effective at $100/mo.
The InBody underestimated Jackson's body fat by 3.1%.
Along with costing $7,000-$30,000 - the InBody recorded an average error of 5.2% in Kino's test set, nearly 2x as high as Kino's average error.
The seca had less error than the InBody, but was wrong by 2.3%.
Based on cited literature, the seca mBCA also has higher error than Kino, but costs $10,000+ for the machine, along with a $100+/mo subscription.
Try Kino for free today. Talk to one of our founders and get your gym set-up with Kino in less than 30 minutes.
BOOK A DEMO